Danny Bradbury wrote this article based on an NPR report about conflict metals, which are necessary for making smartphones and tablets. He notes that a US law requires companies to reveal where they mine the metals needed for their product, but that there is no law actually preventing the sale of conflict metals. Essentially, a company says, “We got our metals from X,” and the consumer decides whether to purchase the product.
The question this makes me ask:
Digital
communication is becoming increasingly useful, perhaps even necessary, to
social justice movements. Am I correct
in this assertion, and, if so, is there a way to use such media without being
hypocrites? The log in my own eye as
I ask this question is obvious. I own a
smartphone and make occasional edits to this blog with it. Predominantly, my blogging – about justice
and theology – happens on my PC. Although
laptops aren’t mentioned in Bradbury’s article, I expect there is some
technological overlap, but don’t know for sure.
Any hints, anyone?